Windows Mobile 6 Discussion [ Edited ]

[Compxpert]

---

michaelsw wrote:

---

reason wrote:

Well dang! Honest {edited} helpful geek speak instead of more cryin' in the beer........
 
Guess this forum can be helpful after all. 

---

choscheid wrote:

The issue is indeed the wildcard certificate your IT department put ont he Exchange 2007 server, and the fact that WM5 doesn't support wildcard certs.  The supported method from MS was to get a certificate that supported Subject Name Alternatives, which not only give all the features needed for Ex07, but also are fully supported on WM5.  Now give, MS didn't make these certs easy to get as you can either publish one yourself internally with an MS Windows CA, or you can buy then from either of two Third party certificate providers that support Subject Name Alternatives.  Some people are upset that MS mandated subject name alternatives, but with so much of their software needing encryption not only internally, but also for thier outward facing components, it became neccessary.

Your IT department can purchase a cert from either Entrust.com or from Verisign (if they use Verisigns Trusted PKI service).

If the IT department made the mistake of requesting the cert you have via IIS, instead of through the Exchange Management Shell, getting on of these certs will fix a number of issues you may or may not notice are evening happening.

And sorry to go all geek on yall, like some others here, I work at a MS Gold partner and do this all day...

Message Edited by choscheid on 11-11-2007 07:31:47 AM

---

Message Edited by tashina on 11-11-2007 11:06:22 AM

---

What? Wait… your telling me a reference to the “all mighty” must be edited?

 
Wow, clearly 15 percent of the English language is forbidden here and subject to censorship. Where does it say in the guidelines that one can not refer to any religious word or words regardless of meaning? If I’m wrong, please point out where in the guidelines this topic is located, other then “the right to remove or limit” I see no reference in the guidelines that would even suggest that certain specific religious word or words are forbidden. In addition, I see no reference to this topic in the “Terms Of Use” agreement either. Again, if wrong, please point this out. Finally, reading through the “Acceptable Use Policy” I find no reference to this issue there either.

 
AT&T – careful, this is a First Amendment issue, that appears to be violated.

 
Unbelievable.

---

I think you don't get the fact that this board is owned and run by att. First amendment doesn't apply here just like it doesn't apply in the school systems they can limit speech as they please really.... isn't that sad...

Message Edited by Compxpert on 11-11-2007 02:03:07 PM

[tashina]

---

michaelsw wrote:

What? Wait… your telling me a reference to the “all mighty” must be edited?

 
Wow, clearly 15 percent of the English language is forbidden here and subject to censorship. Where does it say in the guidelines that one can not refer to any religious word or words regardless of meaning? If I’m wrong, please point out where in the guidelines this topic is located, other then “the right to remove or limit” I see no reference in the guidelines that would even suggest that certain specific religious word or words are forbidden. In addition, I see no reference to this topic in the “Terms Of Use” agreement either. Again, if wrong, please point this out. Finally, reading through the “Acceptable Use Policy” I find no reference to this issue there either.

---

Hello,

We had a member place an abuse report with the moderation team. What one person considers free speech, another may consider disrespectful, especially where it pertains to religion. Our moderation is intended, to the best of our abilities, to make the forum a postive experience for all members.

From the Guidelines:

- Keep it courteous -
 
Everyone wants to have a positive experience while on the Forums - please make sure that you are not detracting from any other user's experience.

You are welcome to PM any moderator about this issue. Let's keep this thread on topic.

[michaelsw]

---

tashina wrote:

---

michaelsw wrote:

What? Wait… your telling me a reference to the “all mighty” must be edited?

 
Wow, clearly 15 percent of the English language is forbidden here and subject to censorship. Where does it say in the guidelines that one can not refer to any religious word or words regardless of meaning? If I’m wrong, please point out where in the guidelines this topic is located, other then “the right to remove or limit” I see no reference in the guidelines that would even suggest that certain specific religious word or words are forbidden. In addition, I see no reference to this topic in the “Terms Of Use” agreement either. Again, if wrong, please point this out. Finally, reading through the “Acceptable Use Policy” I find no reference to this issue there either.

---

Hello,

We had a member place an abuse report with the moderation team. What one person considers free speech, another may consider disrespectful, especially where it pertains to religion. Our moderation is intended, to the best of our abilities, to make the forum a postive experience for all members.

From the Guidelines:

- Keep it courteous -
 
Everyone wants to have a positive experience while on the Forums - please make sure that you are not detracting from any other user's experience.

You are welcome to PM any moderator about this issue. Let's keep this thread on topic.

---

By dog, your right -

Thank you for your expert opinion of the First Amendment. I will refrain from any further comments for fear that any misinterpreted word or words may offend. Furthermore, I see clearly where I missed the Religious references in all of your legal guidelines, I apologize.

So, back on topic - wah wah wah, where is my WM 6 – you owe it to me

[Xbox360fanboy]

WM6 for the Blackjack may be coming during Armageddon...02/25/2025.

[bg92]

Seeing this forum is aboout WM6 has any one hears anything on it yet

[Hacksniper]

Smeagol wants the precious, smeagol needs the precious...  Where is the precious, where did you hide the precious!  We have seen the precious, we knows the precious exists.  Why won't you let us have our precious?

[Compxpert]

---

bg92 wrote:

Seeing this forum is aboout WM6 has any one hears anything on it yet

---

From what I've seen 11/14 is the BJ update and 11/19 is BJII (Source HoFo). Since that doesn't make sense to me being that update is being released before the BJII i'd say sometime this week. If not this then definately next week.


Message Edited by Compxpert on 11-11-2007 08:00:26 PM

[michaelkirby57]

  i have been a ATT customer well before it became cingular and have had good service with them when i had nokia products. i decided to purchase my first palm phone (treo 680) because of what i do for a living (law enforcement) and after using palm products in the past. i purhcased the tre 680 as soon as it came out and was very happy with it but that soon changed. i had to exchange my 680 twice and having the same problem (locking up, dropping calls) cingular was nice enough to upgrade (sic) me to the 750. When i first got the phone it was good but then i started having trouble with it also (dropping my sd card, losing applications, unable to make/receive calls). i was then (very) happy to hear that an upgrade (wm6) would be available soon (this was mid summer) and could not wait for it. So i waited and waited and waited and waited and still no upgrade. i have been a very loyal customer to ATT and stayed with them through cingular and was happy to have ATT back. i have only one thing to complain about and that is the customer service that we (customers) had received over this upgrade (from ATT and palm). i feel that ATT (and palm) had simply forgotten one thing and that it is the customer(s) that have keep both companies afloat and they are where they are today because of us. So i say this to ATT and palm remember who butters your bread and give us (customers) what i feel we have been overly patience about which is a release date for the treo 750 (and BJ) and i can guarantee one thing, you (ATT and palm) will continue to have loyal and dedicated customers who will continue to buy/upgrade their phones/products not simply because they have to but because they want to.  

[bolt69]

I have not not any problems at all connecting to our Exchange 2007 server.  We did a change over while I've had my Blackjack, and  Exchange 2007 works just as well as 2003.

bolt

[bluyak]

I have my Blackjack synced with my companies Exchange servers. I have never had any problems. I would check with your IT personal.

Now if I could only edit  spreadsheets, docs, and databases.  ATT we are waiting for the promised software so we can do our jobs. Would you please do your job and release it. For us that use Exchange servers we give a rats rump about Good Messaging. If you can't get it to work, may I suggest disabling it and release WM6. Then when you do find a fix to Good Messaging, release an update for those that need it. Please take a hard look at how many user really need Good Messaging vs those that don't. It doesn't make since to not release WM6 because of one 3rd party program bug.

[MobileMan]

I will ask the moderators again...in order to make it easier for us, your paying customers, to read info specific to only our devices, can we please have one WM6 thread in the Palm forums and one WM6 thread in the Blackjack forums?  Since you can lock any new WM6 threads that come up, this means you should only have 2 threads to monitor.  Surely that can't be any more difficult than monitoring this runaway train.

[Sentry]

---

MobileMan wrote:

I will ask the moderators again...in order to make it easier for us, your paying customers, to read info specific to only our devices, can we please have one WM6 thread in the Palm forums and one WM6 thread in the Blackjack forums?  Since you can lock any new WM6 threads that come up, this means you should only have 2 threads to monitor.  Surely that can't be any more difficult than monitoring this runaway train.

---

Sure. Two runaway trains, huh...

Why not?

Palm's thread can be found here. Samsung's thread can be found here.

Message Edited by Sentry on 11-12-2007 08:45:03 AM