Re: A new broadcast TV delivery concept is challenged in the courts
[ Edited ]‎05-23-2012 06:09:25 AM - edited ‎05-23-2012 06:18:54 AM
Kind of like TV/internet service providers capping the internet service as a means to force you to buy their TV service instead of having unfettered access to internet based TV. Or a company that says it's service is the end all, be all, that everyone should have, and then stop the buildout because 60% coverage is more than enough to be a thorn in the side of their competition (and now there's wireless to work on). Talk about a short attention span. They gave up on DSL, they gave up on Uverse, they've definately given up on quality customer service, if they give up on wireless next, they've basically worked their way out of the industry altogether. Probably the only thing they won't give up on is POTS because that keeps them in posesion of the last mile.
I wouldn't mind government "interference", if it was not a government funded and/or led around by their noses by corporate America. Especially now that big business can dump astronomical piles of money into campaigns.
__________________________________________________
How can you be in two places at once, when your not anywhere at all?
--------------------------------------------------
I really want to become a procrastinator, but I keep putting it off.
--------------------------------------------------
There are three kinds of people, those that can count, and those that can't.
--------------------------------------------------
“Our great democracies still tend to think that a stupid man is more likely to be honest than a clever man, and our politicians take advantage of this prejudice by pretending to be even more stupid than nature has made them." :Bertrand Russell

