SomeJoe7777
Posts: 9,311
Topics: 1,000
Kudos: 950
Solutions: 216
Registered: ‎01-30-2008
Re: Possible New iNID

 


trparky wrote:

Yeah, but I thought you need the upload speed to be able to handle the higher download speeds due to the fact that you have to factor in the standard TCP/IP handshake in which if you don't have enough upstream your downstream is limited because ACK packets aren't getting to the endpoint fast enough.


 

That's not really a bandwidth issue, but more of a latency issue.

 

For 1500 byte download IP packets, the ACK is only 64 bytes.  That's over a 20:1 ratio, meaning you only need 1/20th the bandwidth in the upload direction.  For an 18 Mbps download, that translates to only about 900 kbps in the upload direction.

 

But if the end-point to end-point latency is high, then the TCP window has to expand in order for the sender to utilize the full bandwidth.  Vista and 7 handle this well, XP only does so with some TCP/IP stack tweaking.

 

*The views and opinions expressed on this forum are purely my own. Any product claim, statistic, quote, or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider, or party.